![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gabriele Stoll
Natural Crop Protection in the Tropics
Letting Information Come to Life
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letting information come to life
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letting information come to life
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Mothers, Fathers and Midwives of
Invention:
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zamorano’s natural pest control
course
by Jeffery W. Bentley, PhD
Background and context
Maize and beans are the main food crops of
Honduras and the rest of Central America. Beginning in 1980,
Zamorano (Escuela Agricola Panamericana) provided scientific,
IPM (integrated pest management) research for smallholder maize
& bean farmers. Early efforts were led by Keith Andrews, a
US entomologist, who founded the Department of Crop Protection
at Zamorano. Although the Department’s focus was IPM, it
had a broad enough philosophy to allow for participatory
research in natural crop protection.
Project history
From 1983 to 1991, the centrepiece of the
Department of Crop Protection was its Maize-Bean Section, which
was Zamorano’s first experience working on-farm with
smallholders. The Maize-Bean’s work was influenced by FSR
(Farming Systems Research) and by anthropologists. The
agronomists did formal on-farm trials, and were influenced by
farmers, who helped manage the trials. The Maize-Bean Section
invented several useful technologies (e.g. trash traps to
control bean slugs, Sarasinula
plebeia), and conducted some formal
experiments with extension, which showed that visual aids were
expensive, but did not necessarily aid in teaching. Perhaps the
Section’s most important contribution was the notion that
IPM research/extension programmes should teach farmers basic
biological information, e.g. life cycles of key pests, to give
farmers the concepts that underlie IPM technologies.
Between 1988 and 1989, Project members
tried to induce 14 farmers in a village near Zamorano to invent
new technologies for managing maize ear rots (a disease complex
caused by the fungi Stenocarpella spp. and Fusarium
maydis). We gave a scientific
seminar on ear rots to farmers, emphasizing the causal agents
(fungi) of maize ear rots, the one topic about the disease
which farmers understood poorly. We gave samples of seed to
farmers to test for resistance (an improved, open-pollinated
variety, and a local variety from another province). Farmers
also looked through stereoscopes to observe the fungus better.
Of 14 farmers who received plant pathology training, 13 planted
varietal trials, but only one of them conducted a more novel
experiment. He planted a maize field where the irrigation water
flowed from the west and the wind blew from the north, so he
could use the pattern of ear rots in his field to determine
whether the inoculum was transported by water or air.
That experience taught us that
farmers could invent things, by blending scientific and local
knowledge, but that we would need to work with many more
farmers to get a large enough sample of really good farmer
experimenters to invent many useful techniques. We formed the
Hillsides IPM Section team in 1991 to do that.
Organizational structure and stakeholders
At first, we taught short courses at
Zamorano (described below), to NGO extensionists,
para-technicals and farmers associated with the NGOs. Team
members drove hundreds of kilometres every week to visit remote
NGO personnel and farmers who had taken the short course. There
were eventually 10 people in the Section, including 2 Honduran
farmers. In 1993, 2 of the Salvadoran agronomists began
teaching courses to NGOs in El Salvador. In 1994, we opened a
Hillsides IPM Programme in Nicaragua with Swiss support.
10 Farmer inventions in response to
natural pest control training
1. Sugar water to control fall armyworm in
maize.
2. Caterpillar soup for spreading
entomopathogens
to caterpillars in beans.
3. Gliricidia
sepium leaves to reduce white
grub
(Phyllophaga spp., Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
damage to crop roots.
4. Neem leaf slurry to deter fire ants
from seeds.
5. Crushed June beetles (adult Phyllophaga spp.)
to discourage females from laying
eggs in soil.
6. Bell pepper and onion to deter chilli
weevils
(Anthonomus
eugenii, Coleoptera:
Curculionidae).
7. Cabbage planted under maize to deter
diamondback
moths, (Plutella
xylostella, Lepidoptera:
Plutellidae)
with maize as a habitat for earwigs,
natural enemies
of Plutella
xylostella.
8. Sacks as barriers against whiteflies
(Bemisia
tabaci, Homoptera: Aleyrodidae).
9. Gourd fruit to distract leaf cutter
ants
(Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini).
10. Chilli, marigold & alcohol applied
on slugs in trash traps.
The printed version contains more
information about the following themes:
Motivations and expectations of the
farmers
Research
Outputs
Linkages
Economics
Sustainability of the approach
Assessment
Conclusions and recommendations for others
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |