Gabriele Stoll
Natural Crop Protection in the Tropics
Letting Information Come to Life
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letting information come to life
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letting information come to life
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zambezi Valley Organic Cotton Project
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by Sam Page PhD, AfFOResT
Background
This project is based in the Dande
communal area, situated along the northern edge of Zimbabwe.
This is a hot, dry, forested region, plagued by malaria and
sleeping sickness, which occupies the flood plain of the mighty
Zambezi River. Here the Tonga people have practised shifting
cultivation, alongside herds of elephant and other wild
animals, for thousands of years. It is of interest to note that
these farmers were amongst the first to domesticate Gossypium herbaceum
var. africanum, which is considered to be the precursor of modern
Deltapine cottons.
In recent years the EU has funded
successful research which has led to the decline of sleeping
sickness in Dande. As a result of this decline the Zimbabwe
government has been able to resettle hundreds of new farmers
and their cattle in the area. These resettled farmers and their
families have each been allocated 12 acres (4.9 ha) of virgin
land and advised to grow cotton as their main cash crop. The
local extension service has stressed the importance of cutting
down all the trees on the arable land and the routine use of
pesticides to control the myriad of pests that attack the
cotton monocultures.
Cotton growers on communal land in
particular are advised to spray up to nine different
organophosphate and up to five different pyrethroid pesticides
to control American, red and spiny bollworms, aphids and red
spidermites, at two weekly intervals. The resettlement
programme and, in particular, conventional cotton production in
Dande has resulted in massive environmental degradation and
brought the resettled farmers into conflict with the indigenous
farmers, whose traditional farming methods had, hitherto, been
in harmony with environmental conservation.
Motivations and expectations of the farmers
Farmers are motivated to join the organic
cotton project primarily by the promise of savings on input
costs and the possibility of obtaining a cash premium for their
harvest. Organic farmers also experience lower labour
requirements – our research has shown that conventional
cotton growers spend an average of 15 hours per week on tasks
associated with procuring and applying pesticides. In an
organic system the farmers spend one to two hours per week
scouting their own land and another two hours attending their
local FFS (farmer field school). Many farmers are aware of the
toxic effects of pesticides and see the creation of a
pesticide-free environment as an added benefit provided by the
conversion to organic agriculture. Lower labour requirements
and lower production costs have also attracted many AIDS widows
to the organic project. These women are generally
resource-poor, constrained by labour shortages and
inexperienced in financial and farm management. The
community-based FFSs have become support groups in which these
issues can be addressed sympathetically.
Research and extension approach of the
project
The project was initiated by a group of
40, mainly women farmers, who were too poor to buy pesticides.
These farmers had also expressed concerns regarding their
health and the health of their environment as a result of
repeated pesticide applications. During this early stage of the
project the farmers had simply substituted home-made remedies,
such as fermented cow urine, ground chilli peppers and Datura stramonium,
for the conventional pesticides. The results were disappointing
in terms of the quality of the ”pesticide-free”
cotton, as these remedies had not reduced pest pressure. The
following season one of the field officers who had been working
with these farmers approached African Farmers’ Organic
Research and Training (AfFOResT) for assistance.
AfFOResT training is based on the
”Farmer Field School” (FFS) approach that was
pioneered by the FAO in Asia during the 1980s. AfFOResT has
adapted this training for local conditions and for organic
agricultural production. The initial intensive training for up
to ten farmers lasted for 4 weeks. The first 30 Farmer Field
Workers (FFWs) were trained in 1997. The second group of 27
farmers were trained at the Eco-Lab of AfFOResT over a period
of 12 weeks, between June and September 1998, in natural pest
management and organic farming methods. The new FFWs were
selected by their peers and will be active during the 1998/99
season. Unfortunately, we have discovered that the farmers are
selecting their relatives to be trained as FFWs, in the hope
that they will benefit from any allowances which may accrue,
rather than choosing someone who is committed to serving his or
her community. AfFOResT is planning to improve the selection
process next season by nominating several hard-working farmers
as candidates amongst whom the farmers can vote.
During their training at the Eco-Lab, the
farmers learn basic soil science, botany and biological control
of pests through a series of simple experiments. They learn
about insect life cycles, pest-predator relations, disease
transmission and development, and the way natural and synthetic
pesticides work, through a series of in-field and 'jam-jar'
experiments. As these trained farmers will also be responsible
for the project’s internal control system, they are
familiarized with the IFOAM (International Federation of
Organic Agriculture Movements) regulations and spend time
developing expertise in the drawing of farm maps and the
planning of rotations and intercropping systems to reduce pests
and encourage foraging by natural enemies. The training is
carried out in a spirit of 'sharing ideas' and the FFWs learn
techniques which enable them to become keen observers and
innovators in both a scientific and creative way.
On returning to their communities, the
FFWs share their new knowledge and ways of learning with the
ten farmers who originally selected them. At the same time they
should continue to receive support from AfFOResT staff. The
FFWs conduct regular FFSs, and ensure that individual farmers
adhere to the agreed guidelines for organic production. During
the FFS, the farmers' groups scout for pests and predators,
discuss control strategies and carry out simple experiments on
insect life cycles. They also examine the efficacy of local
natural pesticides, and the comparative susceptibility of crop
varieties to pests. AfFOResT's role during these FFSs is to
support the FFWs in their job as facilitators and to offer
advice when asked to do so.
Once the organic crops are established,
the FFWs facilitate weekly FFSs for ten other farmers who have
registered to join the project. During these FFSs, the organic
farmers follow a 'learning through discovery' programme which
has been specially developed by the FFWs and AfFOResT
scientists to support their conversion to organic agriculture.
The weekly FFSs begin with group scouting
of cotton plants for pests and natural enemies (termed
”agroecosystem analysis” by FAO). The results of
this exercise are displayed pictorially and reported in terms
of the numbers of pests in relation to the numbers of their
natural enemies which were found in a representative sample of
the crop. Pest management strategies are discussed and spot
treatment using herbal remedies (botanicals) may be used, but
only as a last resort. Farmers soon learn not to despair when
aphids are present on the immature cotton plants as these pests
will attract large numbers of natural enemies, such as
lace-wing larvae, predatory ants and parasitoid wasps, which
will also attack the more serious bollworms later in the
season. During the FFSs the farmers also conduct simple
experiments to study the properties of healthy soils, life
cycles of pests and their natural enemies and the effects of
herbal remedies on these insects. AfFOResT is responsible for
providing follow-up support of the FFWs and their farmers
throughout the season.
The organic cotton farmers follow
production guidelines which encourage the retention of some
indigenous trees and shrubs, both within and bordering their
fields, to stabilise the soil and provide a refuge for natural
enemies. They are also advised to plant live fences of Jatropha
and other goat-proof bushes. Once these are established the
farmers can mulch their land with grass, leaves and crop
residues and introduce zero or minimum tillage in order to
prevent soil erosion. The farmers are supposed to rotate their
cotton with a legume and a cereal crop to break the life cycle
of pests, for the maintenance of soil fertility and the
promotion of food security. Some farmers are using sunnhemp as
a green manure to add organic matter, improve the nitrogen
content of the soil and as to act as a trap crop for
phyto-nematodes and witch-weed. The production guidelines seek
to establish a 'closed system', eliminating the need for
external inputs, as set out in the IFOAM basic standards.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eco-Lab experiment during training
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The printed version contains more
information about the following themes:
Organization structure and stakeholders
Research
Linkages
Economics
Sustainability of Approach
Assessment
Recommendations for future training
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||